مشرف کے بیرون ملک فرار میں ایک حکمت

مشرف کے بیرون ملک فرار میں ایک یہ حکمت بھی ہےکے اب کوئی لبرل ، بوٹ پالیشیا یا حوالدار یہ نہیں رو سکے گا کے طالبان پاکستان کے آئین کونہیں مانتے اور ریاست کی رٹ چلینج کرتے ہیں

‫#‏فاطمہ_شاہ‬

Happy Pakistan Day

 ﻧﻣﻔﻠﺴﯽ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻭﮦ ﺩﻥ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺁٰﺋﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ

ﮨﻢ ﻧﮯ ﺍﭘﻨﺎ ﻣﻼﻝ ﺑﯿﭻ ﺩﯾﺎ.

ﺳﻦ ﺳﯿﻨﺘﺎﻟﯿﺲ ﮐﯽ ﯾﮧ ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺮ ﮐﮧ ﺟﺲ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﮎ ﻋﻮﺭﺕ ﮐﯽ ﻋﺼﻤﺖ ﺩﺭﯼ ﮐﯽ ﮔﺊ ﮨﻮﮔﯽ ﺑﮍﮮ ﻓﺴﻮﮞ ﺳﮯ ﺟﻤﻨﺎ ﮐﮯ ﮐﻨﺎﺭﮮ ﺑﮩﺎﺋﯽ ﮔﺊ ﮨﻮﮔﯽ!ﺟﺴﮯ ﭘﮩﻠﮯ ﺑﮭﯽ ﮐﺘﻮﮞ ﻧﮯ ﻧﻮﭼﺎ ﮨﻮﮔﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﮭﯽ ﻧﻮﭼﺎ ﮨﻮﮔﺎ!ﮐﯿﺴﮯ ﮐﮩﺎﮞ ﮐﺐ ﮐﯿﻮﮞ ﮐﺘﻨﯽ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﻨﮯ ﺍﭘﻨﮯ ﺟﺴﻢﮐﻮ ﮈﮬﺎﭘﻨﺎ ﮨﻮﮔﺎ! ﮐﺘﻨﯽ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﮯ ﺑﮭﺎﮔﯽﮨﻮﮔﯽ!ﮐﺘﻨﻮﮞ ﻧﮯ ﭘﮑﮍ ﮐﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﮐﻮﺟﮭﻨﺠﮭﻮﮌﺍ ﮨﻮﮔﺎ! ﮐﯿﻮﮞ ﮐﮩﺎﮞ ﮐﺐ ﻭﮦﻏﯿﺮﺕ ﺳﮯ ﻣﻨﻤﻨﺎﺋﯽ ﮨﻮﮔﯽ!ﭘﺎﮐﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﮐﻮ ﺭﺥ ﺭﮐﮫ ﮐﮯ ﭼﻼﺋﯽ ﮨﻮﮔﯽ!ﻣﺮﺗﮯ ﺳﻤﮯ ﺗﮏ ﺟﻮﺁﺧﺮﯼ ﺧﻮﺍﮨﺶ ﮐﮧ ﻣﺠﮭﮯ ﻣﺠﮭﮯ ﮈﮬﺎﻧﭙﻮ! ﻟﻠﮧ ﮨﺎ ﻣﺠﮭﮯ ﮈﮬﺎﻧﭙﻮ!ﻣﯿﺮﺍ ﺗﻦ ﻣﯿﺮﯼ ﻋﺰﺕ ﻣﯿﺮﺍ ﺑﮭﺎﺋﯽ ﻣﯿﺮﯼ ﻣﺎﮞ ﻣﯿﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﭖ ﮐﮧ ﻏﻢ ﮨﺎ! ﺁﺝ ﺑﻌﯿﺪ ﮐﯽ ﺳﺎﺕ ﺩﮨﺎﺋﯿﻮﮞ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺘﺎ ﮨﻮﮞ!ﮐﮧ ﮐﮩﮧ ﺭﮨﯿﮟ ﮐﭽﮫ ﺩﻝ ﮐﯽ ﺩﮬﮍﮐﻨﯿﮟ!
ﻣٰﯿﮟ ﺍﻧﮩﯽ ﮐﻼﺑﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﻧﻮﭼﯽ ﮨﻮﺋﯽ ، ﺭﻭﮞ ﺭﻭﮞ ﻣﻘﺼﺮﯾﺖ ﮐﮯ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻧﻮﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺩﺑﻮﭼﯽ ﮨﻮﺋﯽ! ﺍﺳﯽ ﺍﺳﯽ ﻋﻮﺭﺕ ﮐﯽ ﮨﻢ ﺟﻨﺲ ﮨﺎ ﺳﮯ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﮐﺮﺗﺎ ﮨﻮﮞ!ﺟﺴﮯ ﮐﻞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻧﮯ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺎ ﮐﮭﻼ ﺳﺮ ﮐﮭﻼ ﺳﯿﻨﺎ ﮐﮭﻠﮯ ﺑﺎﺯﻭ ﻟﯿﮯ ﭘﻠﮯ ﮐﺎﺭﮈ ﺍﭨﮭﺎﺋﮯ ﮨﻮﺋﮯ ﮐﮧ ﺟﮩﺎﮞ ﺍﺱ ﻧﮯ ﻟﮑﮫ ﺭﮐﮭﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ !

ﻣﯿﺮﺍ ﺟﺴﻢ...
ﻣﯿﺮﺍ ﮔﮭﺮ ..
ﻣﯿﺮﯼ ﻣﺮﺿﯽ ...
ﻣﻮﻟﻮﯼ ﺗﻮ ﻧﺎ ﺑﻮﻝ !..
ﻣﻼﺅﮞ ﮨﻤﺎﺭﯼ ﺗﻤﮩﺎﺭﯼ ﺟﻨﮓ ﮬﮯ!

.ﺗﻮ ﻣﺠﮭﮯ ﺍُﺱ ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺮ ﮐﯽ ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺧﯿﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍِﺱ ﮐُﺘﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﻧُﭽﯽ ﭘﮍﯼ ﭘﮧ ﺯﺭﮦ ﻣﻼﻝ ﻧﮧ .

Mulana Azad's bold remarks on Two nations theory

Mulana Azad's bold remarks on Two nations theory, ground realities and the question of partition.

Reference: India Wins Freedom, page. 248, by Mulana Azad, 1957

During a robbery

During a robbery, the bank robber shouted to everyone in the bank: “Don’t move. The money belongs to the State. Your life belongs to you.” Everyone in the bank laid down quietly. This is called “Mind Changing Concept” Changing the conventional way of thinking. When a lady lay on the table provocatively, the robber shouted at her: “Please be civilized! This is a robbery and not a rape!” This is called “Being Professional” Focus only on what you are trained to do! When the bank robbers returned home, the younger robber (MBA-trained) told the older robber (who has only completed Year 6 in primary school): “Big brother, let’s count how much we got.” The older robber rebutted and said: “You are very stupid. There is so much money it will take us a long time to count. Tonight, the TV news will tell us how much we robbed from the bank!” This is called “Experience.” Nowadays, experience is more important than paper qualifications! After the robbers had left, the bank manager told the bank supervisor to call the police quickly. But the supervisor said to him: “Wait! Let us take out $10 million from the bank for ourselves and add it to the $70 million that we have previously embezzled from the bank”. This is called “Swim with the tide.” Converting an unfavorable situation to your advantage!
The supervisor says: “It will be good if there is a robbery every month.” This is called “Killing Boredom.” Personal Happiness is more important than your job. The next day, the TV news reported that $100 million was taken from the bank. The robbers counted and counted and counted, but they could only count $20 million. The robbers were very angry and complained: “We risked our lives and only took $20 million. The bank manager took $80 million with a snap of his fingers. It looks like it is better to be educated than to be a thief!” This is called “Knowledge is worth as much as gold!”
The bank manager was smiling and happy because his losses in the share market are now covered by this robbery.This is called “Seizing the opportunity.” Daring to take risks! So who are the real robbers here?

Things have never been so old, to manipulate the truth

Things have never been so old, to manipulate the truth. An uproar was heard, when the court issued its verdict on the video of a girl belonging to swat, allegedly flogged by the Taliban, as a fake one. Reactionary arguments started, claiming that the mainstream media should be tried for the guilt which according to them caused military intervention across Swat, Malakand, Dir and Buner. Meanwhile, the terrorists bathed Charsadda in blood. Different people gave different responses. Some tried to give it nationalistic colour, some blasted as usual at religious fanatics, some taunted at secular and liberals, some tried to promote their party that their workers were first to provide relief and first aid to victims of the incident, some persons condemned the attack, some institutions reaffirmed their oral faith to fight the enemies till the death of last terrorists, whereas some were just silent, unable to react in any means due to shock. This has never been something new.

For years, we saw the nurseries developing into crops, self recurring after harvest, their dropped seeds incorporating inside the soil for a future crop. It is said, that you reap what you sow. Today we are reaping. Since, the seeds have been incorporated for years, the complete elimination may take an equal number of years, if not double. One may not agree about the art of harvesting, but no one can falsify the harvest in principle. The atrocities which we are facing at their hands in the name of terrorism, just as others outside our country faced years before us in the name of so called Jehad, are as tragic as the previous. The question here for us to understand is that if we believe that a man reaps what he sows, then admit that we are now reaping, which is going to cost us. Just as reaping is opposite to sowing, in the same way the outcome of our sowing which cost others to hurt will definitely reshape into hurting us when we reap it now. It may sound annoying, but thats the harsh reality. And the irony is, that everytime the common man suffered. Perhaps, one may object to nature here, but only if he is not aware of the background.

Today, we are at the crucial stage. Those, infact a large segment of the society, who are still convinced that a dialogue instead of war with militants would bear fruitful results are trying to act as an ostrich who hides his head in sand for protection. Trained to kill will never become pacifists. And those who believe in extermination of these beasts, should also accept that the state's armed forces alone can never eliminate them. They will have to believe that successful extermination is possible only after exterminating the breeders. Only the state's system can do it, and armed forces is only a part of the state's system. If system as a whole produces militants continuously and a part of it, say the armed forces, reaps it, then this never ending process will continue with no results. Ignorance begets terrorism. Poverty catalyses it. Sectarianism intensifies it. Imperialism occupies it. If system as whole will produce poverty, illiteracy and sectarian hatred through its imperial foothold and the armed forces will only fight without being assisted from the system by jamming the channels which provides fresh blood to terrorism in the form of poverty, illiteracy etc, then nothing will come out of the bag.

Terrorism, as it is often called, have now become a state of mind. The first responsibility on our part is to segregate our mind from such ideas by saying no to those who provides blood for it. Whoever they are and with whatever a name or slogan they use it for this, whether religious or atheist, must be rejected. Understanding the things has never been so difficult as it was in past. Be noble. Allah be praised

The 1940s saw the British Empire caught by a severe headache of Soviet expansion

The 1940s saw the British Empire caught by a severe headache of Soviet expansion. The British Raj in India was concerned with containing the communist spread, by maintaining a political buffer across FATA and the North West Frontier Province, for which she wanted the cooperation of provincial government of the frontier province ( now KPK). Due to strong rivalry between the Khudayi Khidmatgars which had formed ministry at NWFP and the British rule, the ocal religious clerics were raised against Khudayi Khidmatgars. These clerics were paid on monthly basis, under the supervision of the governor of NWFP, Sir George Cunningham. The role of these cleric was to gather moral support for Britishers to fight Russia, on the grounds that Soviet Russia was against any religion, and that the Britishers who although are non Muslims but Ihl e Kitab. When the Chief Minister, Dr. Khan Sahib disclosed this shameful scheme, the role of these clerics was doubled. Along with anti soviet stance, the Khudayi Khidmatgar's led government of Dr. Khan Sahib, was labelled with Fatwas of Kufar.

References: 1) Diary of Sir George Cunningham, former Governer, NWFP, British India.

2) Letters by Lord Wavell to Secretary of State for British India, India Office Library London.

3) Letters by Lord Linlithgow to Secretary of State For British India, Royal Archives, London.

4) Facts Are Facts, A. W. Khan, Pakistan.

A warm debate is in full swing between the nationalist secular and the followers of Mulana Syed Mudodi

A warm debate is in full swing. The followers of nationalist secular thought are busy in glorifying Bacha Khan whereas the followers of Mulana Syed Mudodi are defending their political thought. Both are based on hatred towards each others. The secular nationalists maintain that the state has adopted Mudodi's philosophy, with patronage from former dictator Zia Ul Haq, which in turn gave the evils of terrorism, anarchism and polarization of the society. The followers of Syed Mudodi insist that their thought is away of this, and that the state has never adopted their thought, if it had adopted, Pakistan would have been out of crisis today. Both have strong reasons behind their claims on primary basis, but misunderstandings can be seen clearly.

The way, in which the so called secular and liberals have abused their religious counterparts, makes it concluded for a person that Pakistan has been so for ruled by the religious leadership, bringing crisis and disorder. The fact is, that no popular religious leadership has so far been in absolute power. Similarly no popularly elected secular and liberal party, truly committed to the teachings of secular and liberal thought have been in power, since inception. Where lies the state, in terms of ideological orientations?
No registered party, whether religious or secular, is allowed to go inside the parliament against the constitutional terms. The constitution has bounded them to believe in the ideological basis of this country, a basis although constitutionally guarded but never defined in terms of ground realities. Who ruled this country when there was no constitution for the first nine years? What political name did all the dictators used to save their dictatorship disguised in democracy? Who have created a strong foothold through use of their capitalistic power disguised in the form of a political party, who is always favorite to be popularly elected? What is their back ground? Where does the very inception lies? What has been their political thought? Here is no room for naked conversation otherwise many decorated figures would go down naked from history.

One should believe in reality, which always taste bitter. The BAYANIA of this state, is to give democracy in the light of Two Nations Theory. Democracy and Two Nations Theory, a theory which divides nations along lines of hatred. In this state, your democracy is debated for hatred against a nation which is said to be a teaser for us. This ideology, making you today to cause Indo Pakistani split. To cause Pakistani-Iranian split. Pakistani Afghani Split. A bit of time is needed and hatred against China may get precipitated in the name of Sinkiang's Muslims. The only option left to deal is the southern Arabian sea, which awaits our drowning. This is ideology. This is our state's orientation. Where hatred is constitutionally promoted. It cannot be denied that Conflicts among nations have been there, but is it wise to constitutionally promote it to generations? Your state's Bayania is to teach you that only you are Muslim with all of your prejudices. India is your natural enemy, Afghanistan and Iran are pro Indian so deserve equal hatred from us. There must be a loyal to us Muslim ruling inside these countries, no matter how cunning, how prejudiced and how hypocrite we are. Because our Two Nations Theory needs it.

Back to initial point, it is now for those who want to evaluate state's position. Those who maintain that this constitutional basis is right, are either directly or indirectly in favor of State's declaration.

Kashif Jehangir Niazi.